Skip to Main Content
HOMEGUIDESDATABASESHELP

Course Guide ~ ARCH 106 Principles of Archaeology

A course guide with materials specifically tailored for Lacey Carpenter's First Year Course section of ARCH 106

Journals

Databases

Evaluating Scientific Sources

Questions on methodology

  • Is the study design suited to fulfill the aims of the study?

  • Is it stated whether the study is confirmatory, exploratory or descriptive in nature?

  • What type of study was chosen, and does it permit the aims of the study to be addressed?

  • Is the study’s endpoint precisely defined?

  • What statistical measure is employed to characterize the endpoint?

    • Do epidemiological studies, for instance, give the incidence (rate of new cases), prevalence (current number of cases), mortality (proportion of the population that dies of the disease concerned), lethality (proportion of those with the disease who die of it) or the hospital admission rate (proportion of the population admitted to hospital because of the disease)?

  • Are the geographical area, the population, the study period (including duration of follow-up), and the intervals between investigations described in detail?

Critical questions

  • Does the study pose scientifically interesting questions?

  • Are statements and numerical data supported by literature citations?

  • Is the topic of the study medically relevant?

  • Is the study innovative?

  • Does the study investigate the predefined study goals?

  • Is the study design apt to address the aims and/or hypotheses?

  • Did practical difficulties (e.g. in recruitment or loss to follow-up) lead to major compromises in study implementation compared with the study protocol?

  • Was the number of missing values too large to permit meaningful analysis?

  • Was the number of cases too small and thus the statistical power of the study too low?

  • Was the course of the study poorly or inadequately monitored (missing values, confounding, time infringements)?

  • Do the data support the authors’ conclusions?

  • Do the authors and/or the sponsor of the study have irreconcilable financial or ideological conflicts of interest?

 

 

from du Prel, J. B., Röhrig, B., & Blettner, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of scientific articles: part 1 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Arzteblatt international106(7), 100–105. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0100

Hamilton College, 198 College Hill Road, Clinton, NY 13323 • 315-859-4735 • Copyright © 2017 The Trustees of Hamilton College. All rights reserved.